Mitt Romney’s Solyndra Moment 1

Talk about the ultimate glass house. Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney has been on the warpath recently, taking his time to decry President Obama’s backing of Solyndra. Turns out that a solar company Romney supported when he was governor of Massachusetts has just gone out of business, too.

As reported in the Boston Globe, Konarka Technologies Inc. filed to liquidate on June 1. This company was the beneficiary of both state and US aid, an aspect that will absolutely declaw Romney’s attacks on Obama for supporting Solyndra. “It demonstrates the ‘problem’ of having a record, in that obscure decisions and circumstances come to light, often far removed from their original frameworks,” University of Kansas political science professor Burdett Loomis explained.

When Romney was still governor of Massachusetts, he gave $1.5 million in loans to Konarka as part of a $9 million state-funding project for clean energy companies. Romney additionally announced a restructured “green fund” amounting to $15 million would be available to bolster renewable energy in Massachusetts. In all Konarka got $170 million in private capital and $20 million in government research grants.

Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul tried to spin this situation as much as possible explaining the subsidies were approved before Romney came into office and turned the topic back to Obama, claiming he has “a lot of questions to answer about why he used taxpayer dollars to reward wealthy campaign donors for bad ideas like Solyndra.” Solyndra’s leading investor was billionaire Obama supporter George Kaiser, but the Republican-led congressional investigation into the Obama administration’s alleged ties to the billionaire has come up with nothing supporting the claim that Obama was rewarding a political donor.

“Everyday we see a new example of Mitt Romney’s hypocrisy…just one day after he pulled a political stunt outside Solyndra, we learned even more about his record of picking winners and losers in Massachusetts when one of the companies he gave a loan to went bankrupt,” Obama campaign spokeswoman Lis Smith said. The stunt to which Smith was referring was when Romney made a speech outside closed Solyndra Fremont, California facility to highlight Obama’s lack of job creation.

With Konarka’s failure, Romney should probably not risk throwing more rocks lest his glass mansion shatters.

Romney’s Solyndra Moment Uncovered originally appeared in Green Chip Stocks. Green Chip Review is a free 2x-per-week newsletter, is the first advisory to focus exclusively on investments in alternative and renewable energies.

Previous ArticleNext Article

1 Comment

  1. The difference between the two is that the President pointed out to Solyndra as a model for blending government support with business objectives. What the Governor did for Konarka, on the other hand, was simply a ministerial function of his office.

    If the Governor had gone to the press to showcase government support for Konarka, the way our President did Solyndra, the airwaves would be full of it. What your example shows is that the President has a sophomoric understanding of the businesses he supports while the Governor acted like a responsible steward fulfilling the commitments of his office despite NOT believing in what it was that was required of him. In this case the Governor was a very responsible steward.

    Even though I supported others (the emphasis is on the “s”) not Romney, your article emphasizes how ridiculous it was for the President to do what he did in regard to Solyndra. You point out why it is I need to vote for Romney even though I personally would rather have a talk with the President than the Governor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *